MMFA unfortunately has jumped the shark. At one time it was a pretty good antidote to BushCo and Neo-Con propaganda on the Iraq war. But when MMFA starts promoting George Soros' own Open Borders agenda by flacking for the likes of the the Hispanic Congressional Caucas, La Raza, LULAC and MALDEF then they lose lots of Democrats not to mention Idependents.

Their constant carping on Lou Dobbs et al. shows just how intellectually lazy and/or dishonest they are. Can't argue the issues in isolation but need some figurehead/strawman to attack.

Great post, lonewacko. Recommended reading at the link, as well as noting who is on their staff. http://mediamattersaction.org/reports/fearandloathing/online_version http://mediamatters.org/about_us/staff_advisors Calderon promised his government would intensify the meddling in our affairs prior to the elections. I expect we will be hearing more about links between the MMFA, the hispanic caucus and the mexican government in the months ahead.

'...in his book, State of Emergency: The Third World Invasion and Conquest of America (St. Martin's Griffin, 2007). "The ultimate goal of [then Mexican President] Vicente Fox is the erasure of the border between the United States and Mexico," Buchanan told Dobbs in September 2006' Dude! On page 101 of his autobiographical book "Revolution of Hope," former Mexican president Vicente Fox writes: "I proposed a 'NAFTA Plus' plan to President Bush and Canada's Prime Minister Jean Chretien to move us toward a single continental economic union, modeled on the European example." On the next page, Fox notes the White House was reluctant for this theme to be discussed openly. "Bush shot the idea down," Fox continued. "The White House sent word that life would be easier if this Mexican cowboy would stop raising hackles with his talk of a North American Union." ----------------------- 'There are many problems facing the United States today: a faltering economy, a health-care crisis, and the continuing war in Iraq, to name a few.' They sure have a lot of graphs showing Dobbs talks about immigration a lot. If it's just not important enough to report on are you also complaining about WaPo, NYT, etc. running their 'sheer repetition' immigration articles? Or is it the questioning current immigration policy (which results in a large % being illegal) unless it's from their favored political perspective which bugs them? The worst ever example I've ever seen of smoke coming out of someone's ears because the issue dare be raised is Tim Rutten's meltdown: 'CNN intentionally directed the Republicans' debate to advance its own interests. Make immigration a bigger issue and you've made a bigger audience for Dobbs. That's corruption' http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/la-et-rutten1dec01,0,4122002.column

At least they admit what they are--biased: Who We Are Media Matters for America is a Web-based, not-for-profit, 501(c)(3) progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media. As if we didn't already know when you invite special interest caucus members and lobbyist Frank Sharry to your press conference. If you were even attempting to create a veneer of impartiality you don't do that. What's more interesting is yet another link between Frank Sharry and the Hispanic caucus members. Look at the Who We Are of Sharry's former organization National Immigration Forum: 'We are unique in that we do not have a specific constituency–we speak for immigration in the national interest. ' Then why are you hanging out and working with, by definition, special interest caucus members who are all about one ethnic group, not the nation as a whole?

The only way you can stop this BS Is to act like Americans, if you know what i mean and i really don't think you guys can do that so get in line and be good little third world people.