Skip to main content
24Ahead
Navigation
Home
Donate now
Activism
Stop Amnesty Challenge
Help make the Stop Amnesty Challenge happen
Question Authority
Activism guide
How to ask politicians tough questions
Why activism works
Topics
Donald Trump
Immigration topics
Immigration talking points
Immigration advocate groups
Immigration advocate people
Open debate
Other topics
Media sources
Tags
Tweets
Archives
You are here
Home
» Tweets to Glaivester
Tweets to Glaivester
Twitter handle:
@glaivester
Name:
Glaivester
Location:
Someplace in the U.S.A.
Followers:
3519
Bio:
Keep kicking at the darkness till it bleeds daylight - Bruce Cockburn ..................... My pronouns are honk/honk
Tweets to this user:
From
@24aheaddotcom
Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 8:55 pm
It's not hard to imagine a 1930s #Teaparty being swayed by pro-Nazi industrialists as they do #Koch now (NB not saying Koch=Nazi). #ows #gop
From
@antidemblog
Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:35 pm
@24AheadDotCom @Glaivester Ah, the Ancient Aliens approach. "I'm not saying it's Nazis, but..."
From
@calicrusader
Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 8:18 am
RT @Glaivester: .@24AheadDotCom @Ktonacci Cesar Chavez on [his words, not mine] "illegals" and "wetbacks" https://t.co/Jzci47VNF9
From
@calicrusader
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:53 am
RT @Glaivester: .@MontanoJM @pyconnor @24AheadDotCom I do not accept that they are lawfully present in the U.S. Obama & DHS exceeded their …
From
@MontanoJM
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:31 am
@Glaivester What are your thoughts on providing in-state tuition to public colleges/universities to undocumented students or DACA students?
From
@Glaivester
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:40 am
.@MontanoJM And no, illegal aliens should not get subsidized tuition, especially when American citizens are denied it.
From
@MontanoJM
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:43 am
@Glaivester we've been pushing to make DACA students eligible for in-state tuition rates in Virginia.
From
@MontanoJM
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:44 am
@Glaivester DACA students have been considered by the DHS to be lawfully present and can lawfully work in the US
From
@Glaivester
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:44 am
.@MontanoJM You've been fighting to discriminate against out-of-state American citizens in favor of illegal aliens. @pyconnor @24aheaddotcom
From
@Glaivester
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:46 am
.@MontanoJM @pyconnor @24aheaddotcom #DACA students have no legal status; "legal presence" = Obama & DHS won't enforce law.
From
@MontanoJM
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:47 am
@Glaivester @pyconnor @24AheadDotCom given that they're lawfully present in the US, why are you classifying them as "illegal". It puzzles me
From
@Glaivester
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:49 am
.@MontanoJM @pyconnor @24AheadDotCom Because Obama does not have the authority to grant them lawful presence.
From
@Glaivester
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:52 am
.@MontanoJM @pyconnor @24AheadDotCom I do not accept that they are lawfully present in the U.S. Obama & DHS exceeded their authority.
From
@MontanoJM
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:52 am
@Glaivester @pyconnor @24AheadDotCom ahh I see. Whether you accept it or not is irrelevant. They've been deemed to be lawfully present
From
@Glaivester
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:56 am
.@MontanoJM @pyconnor @24AheadDotCom Only by DHS and Obama - courts have not yet ruled that legitimate. Final determination not yet done.
From
@Glaivester
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:58 am
.@MontanoJM @pyconnor @24AheadDotCom Given that final word on #DACA legitimacy not out yet, your acceptance of DHS declaration puzzles me.
From
@Glaivester
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 11:01 am
.@MontanoJM @pyconnor @24AheadDotCom Judge has said #DACA is "probably illegal:" https://t.co/uuqPKPh2hG "Lawful presence" is in dispute.
From
@MontanoJM
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 11:05 am
@Glaivester @pyconnor @24AheadDotCom this seems to be a point on which we'll fundamentally disagree.
From
@MontanoJM
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 11:07 am
@Glaivester @pyconnor @24AheadDotCom be sure to check out a blog I wrote on this topic: http://t.co/H6PuVHMBPa
From
@Glaivester
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 11:20 am
.@MontanoJM @pyconnor @24AheadDotCom Thanks, I'll take a look.
From
@pyconnor
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 11:31 am
@Glaivester @MontanoJM @24AheadDotCom Federal law states that if you give in-state tuition to foreigners, you must give it to Americans.
From
@pyconnor
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 12:12 pm
@Glaivester @MontanoJM @24AheadDotCom Since they did not enter the country lawfully, they are here illegally regardless of Obama's fiat
From
@JoeSixpackSays
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 8:31 am
RT @Glaivester: .@kansasmeteorite @24AheadDotCom @RealAdrianC "False flag" hate crime would not be unprecedented: http://t.co/W2nrrD3JFw
From
@brickdad
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 8:31 am
RT @Glaivester: .@24AheadDotCom @bcgoyette Spending money on #immigration "enforcement" is not necessarily immigration enforcement: http://…
From
@24aheaddotcom
Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 8:26 pm
.@MontanoJM: I heard McDonald's is a strong supporter of immigration reform. Do you know about that? What's their angle?
From
@MontanoJM
Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 6:29 am
@24AheadDotCom Don't know the specifics about McD's but there's overwhelming support from the business community for CIR as a whole. Cont.
From
@MontanoJM
Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 6:31 am
@24AheadDotCom There's no "angle". It simply makes economic sense. Great report on small business support of CIR: http://t.co/Ef6l6PH9EO
From
@Glaivester
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 8:33 am
.@MontanoJM @24AheadDotCom The angle is low wages: http://t.co/7PmDsBxuY3
From
@Glaivester
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 8:34 am
.@MontanoJM @24AheadDotCom Harvard economist George Borjas: mass immigration takes $400B/yr from workers to owners: http://t.co/7PmDsBxuY3
From
@MontanoJM
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 8:47 am
@Glaivester @24AheadDotCom seems like we need to address the issue of raising the minimum wage.
From
@MontanoJM
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 8:48 am
@Glaivester @24AheadDotCom especially since "[McDonald's] cannot even provide their workers with adequate wages to support their families."
From
@Glaivester
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 8:49 am
.@MontanoJM @24AheadDotCom Maybe we do. But raising wages works better with a restricted labor supply.
From
@Glaivester
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 8:50 am
.@MontanoJM @24AheadDotCom Increasing labor supply then increasing minimum wages is like printing money then imposing price controls.
From
@Glaivester
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 8:51 am
.@MontanoJM @24AheadDotCom Note @BeckyTallent's comments on #immigration: http://t.co/Pt407ETMPJ #Poultry plant conditions are so bad (1/2)
From
@MontanoJM
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 8:51 am
@Glaivester @24AheadDotCom I know I'm digressing but personally, I think that states should determine their labor supply needs.
From
@MontanoJM
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 8:52 am
@Glaivester @24AheadDotCom why is the fed. Govt. responsible for capping work visas without knowing a state's labor needs?
From
@Glaivester
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 8:52 am
.@MontanoJM @24AheadDotCom @beckytallent ...prisoners won't work there. So import those who will rather than demand better conditions (2/2).
From
@Glaivester
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 8:53 am
.@MontanoJM @24AheadDotCom The same reason it is responsible for determining what a low-skill worker's time is worth?
From
@MontanoJM
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 8:54 am
@Glaivester @24AheadDotCom determining the number of migrant workers a state needs is different than determining a national min. wage.
From
@Glaivester
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 8:54 am
.@MontanoJM @24AheadDotCom So you think that Arizona's SB1070 should have been upheld in its entirety?
From
@Glaivester
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 8:55 am
.@MontanoJM @24AheadDotCom Can a state determine that it does not need or want immigrant labor and keep the immigrants out?
From
@MontanoJM
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 8:57 am
@Glaivester @24AheadDotCom not sure where you got that from my comments. And no, it should have been deemed unconstitutional.
From
@MontanoJM
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 8:58 am
@Glaivester @24AheadDotCom especially the part that was upheld. The "reasonable suspicion" detention portion. It invites racial profiling
From
@MontanoJM
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 9:01 am
@Glaivester @24AheadDotCom Check out a great event the CATO Institute held about state issued visas: http://t.co/mEXm6UvvUT
From
@pyconnor
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 9:19 am
@Glaivester @MontanoJM @24AheadDotCom Duh!!
From
@pyconnor
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 9:21 am
@MontanoJM @Glaivester @24AheadDotCom States absolutely have the right to model laws on federal law and enforce.
From
@MontanoJM
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 9:32 am
@pyconnor @Glaivester @24AheadDotCom and SCOTUS has the right to deem those laws unconst. Esp. if they're given to rampant discrimination
From
@MontanoJM
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 9:33 am
@pyconnor @Glaivester @24AheadDotCom case in point, DOMA decision
From
@Glaivester
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:11 am
.@MontanoJM @24AheadDotCom @pyconnor My point: you claim to think that states should determine how much immigration they need, not feds.
From
@Glaivester
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:12 am
.@MontanoJM @24AheadDotCom @pyconnor However, you change your mind when the states determine they want LESS immigration than feds.
From
@Glaivester
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:14 am
.@MontanoJM @24AheadDotCom What about a state deciding not to honor federal green cards? Is that okay too?
From
@Glaivester
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:15 am
.@MontanoJM @24AheadDotCom Under your system, if a state thinks it has too many workers, can it prohibit hiring non-citizens?
From
@Glaivester
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:16 am
.@MontanoJM @24AheadDotCom Or can it prohibit hiring particular classes of non-citizens (e.g. guestworkers, non-permanent residents)?
From
@MontanoJM
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:16 am
@Glaivester @24AheadDotCom I don't think you understand the difference between work visas and green cards.
From
@Glaivester
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:17 am
.@MontanoJM @24AheadDotCom Why can it force them to permit foreign workers without knowing its employment needs?
From
@Glaivester
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:19 am
.@MontanoJM @24AheadDotCom You're right, I meant work visas.
From
@MontanoJM
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:26 am
@Glaivester @24AheadDotCom interesting concept. I would say that state-based visas should be issued in addition to the fed. Gov visas issued
From
@Glaivester
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:39 am
.@MontanoJM @24AheadDotCom You mean states should only be given the ability to determine labor needs when they say they need MORE.
From
@pyconnor
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 11:37 am
@MontanoJM @Glaivester @24AheadDotCom I'm an attorney who has had cases in SCOTUS. Vague charges of discrimination are worthless.
From
@24aheaddotcom
Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 7:59 pm
.@mhtalbut: think things through. @BishopSallyDyck is helping #WalMart & #McDonalds lower wages. Why be proud of that? #Methodist #ows #tlot
From
@Glaivester
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 8:37 am
.@24AheadDotCom @mhtalbut @BishopSallyDyck McDonald's reasons for supporting mass #immigration are well-known: http://t.co/ZE8bwiQgnL
From
@LanakiHupo
Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 8:45 am
.@Glaivester .@24AheadDotCom .@mhtalbut .@BishopSallyDyck Besides cheaper employees, another benefit is more customers for inexpensive food.
From
@JamielShawsAunt
Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 6:07 pm
RT @Glaivester: .@24AheadDotCom @sikivuhutch Loose immigration policy can be deadly for blacks: http://t.co/vZX7wf0pPs @gojamielslawgo
From
@HbuiltHovey
Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 10:04 am
RT @Glaivester: .@24AheadDotCom @sikivuhutch Loose immigration policy can be deadly for blacks: http://t.co/vZX7wf0pPs @gojamielslawgo
Pages
« first
‹ previous
…
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
…
next ›
last »