GottaLaff isn't a credible source (Political Carnival)
A few days ago, I posted an example of teapartiers helping me show how they're vile dolts. For balance, consider the image below with a Twitter chat I had with "GottaLaff" of the leftwing blog Political Carnival.
Now, obviously, in the greater scheme of things (or even in the smaller scheme of things), GottaLaff is a non-entity. However, her actions - lying, being unable to understand simple things - are repeated over and over on all sides of the aisles.
But, if you trust what GottaLaff says, review the graphic (start at the end) and decide. If, after reviewing the graphic you still trust what she says about anything, leave a comment and I'll try to change your mind. Don't worry: I'm not a lil' fascist like her so even if you disagree I won't delete your comment. I'll just show how you're wrong (something she can't do).
Summary:
1. GottaLaff ("GL") couldn't figure out the purpose of my first tweet to her. To be frank, I was trying to use her to make Andrew Breitbart cover more important issues than whether or not a Congressman had sent an R-rated picture of himself to a constituent ("WeinerGate"). I wanted her to, instead of her campaign to defend the Congressman, call Breitbart on not covering more important issues. The "oh, wait" part referred to the fact that she's too much of a partisan hack to discuss Tom Vilsack running down American workers. I'm willing to discuss someone running down U.S. workers no matter whether they're a Democrat, a Republican, or anything else. GL puts being a partisan hack ahead of defending American workers from those on her side.
2. GL said I'd accused her of deleting a tweet, when that's not what I did. I providing a link to the post where I pointed out that she did in fact delete a comment I left on Political Carnival. She and her followers were variously confused over the difference between a comment and a tweet. That does not indicate any great ability to think. You can click here to read the post that mentions GottaLaff deleting a comment (see UPDATE 2). If you're a GL supporter, think about that for a second: she posted something highly misleading and then deleted a comment showing how she's wrong. You could have promoted her post, only to look like a fool when others realized how her post - and your promotion of it - was misleading.
3. After lying and showing that she can't understand basic ideas, GL then embarked on a blocking campaign against me. Frankly, I could care less: I don't use Twitter that way and in the unlikely event that Twitter heard her mini-fascistic pleas, it would probably provide me with some good publicity.
4. Which brings me to the last point: GottaLaff is a little fascist. Not a great big fascist such as there are and were in other countries, just a little fascist who does not support speech. GottaLaff is a strict authoritarian, not a liberal. She's simply incapable of debating anyone who disagrees with her; she's unclear on very fundamental American concepts. Instead, as she did before, she tries to silence those who disagree.