John Edwards: deer in the headlights of the 9/11 Truth Movement

The following video shows John Edwards being asked about the WTC 7 by one of those who apparently believes in the 9/11 Truth/MIHOP/LIHOP theory. The reason this is here isn't because of the topic, but to remind everyone that it's not that difficult to ask politicians non-standard questions and then put the answers on youtube, blogs, forums, and other sites.

If even just a few people publicly asked politicians tough questions about immigration matters and promoted their lame responses, that would go a long way towards quashing amnesty. Of course, in this case the question itself was lame, only asking whether Edwards was familiar with the issue. While he looks a bit like an expensively-coiffed deer in the headlights for a moment, he quickly recovers and fobs the questioner off on an assistant.

In the case of immigration, you'd need to point out flaws in his policies in order to show that he hasn't thought the subject through (or supports something different from what he claims).

Comments

That's a good idea: get some accountability going. These candidates do know that they are disfavored or favored by the citzenry, not by those foreigners.

John Edwards is an ambulance chaser who brought nothing to the Presidential campaign he was a part of. His candidacy is going nowhere.

Hard to believe, or maybe not, that he seemed totally nonplussed by the question. Which may indeed have been poorly asked, e.g. perhaps too quietly -- after all, it's mostly treated by the MSM as lunatic fringe 'conspiracy theory' stuff. But look at a video of the WTC-7 collapse: it looks exactly like a controlled demolition. A complete, and seemingly synchronized, global collapse. Given that WTC-7 suffered minor-looking structural damage only on its south side, and some fires, which were not fueled by jet fuel, how can such a catastrophic failure in a modern steel building (less than 15 y/o) be explained?