If that document can pass for real i have one that states hitler was born here in san diego in 1888, so why can't hitler be president or some monkey from south america?

My opinion is that Obama was born in Hawaii and therefore qualified to be president. Still I would like proof of my opinion. And if that is the case, why doesn't the president who campaigned on the promise of bring greater transparency to the White House simply release his birth records? This exactly the point Lou Dobbs has been making. Yet Dobbs has been accused of being a "birther". It leads anybody who is remotely skeptical to speculate that there must be something that has not been revealed that would endanger the carefully crafted lifestory that Obama and his guru Axelrod have so far promoted. Is it possible that Obama as a child had his name changed when he was adopted by his stepfather and or changed again when he moved back to Hawaii to attend prep school and live with his grand-parents? The Obama campaign has relentlessly tried to downplay the facts that while living in Indonesia Obama was being raised as a Muslim. Barack was registered as a Muslim and received Islamic instruction in Indonesian schools as religious training was required by law. This being the only formal religious exposure Obama had prior to his politically calculated association with Rev Wright. The MSM followed the Obama campaign's lead to the point of accusing those who mentioned these facts as racist haters. As a Democrat, I must mention that our side fought for years to have Dubya's military records be released. And rightfully so in the public interest of full transparency concerning those running for president. However, the hardest of the hardcore Democratic partisans accused Bush of being AWOL from the TANG. This misguided hyper-partisanship only helped lead to the infamous Dan Rather forgery fiasco that only made the partisan Democratic base look positively wacko in many eyes. However, all along there was a more likely scenario as for why Bush was able to leave the TANG and face no penalty. As Bush admitted numerous times, he had become a heavy drinker and "recreational" drug user by the early seventies. By 1972 and the Vietnam drawdown along with the phase out of the notoriously demanding late 50's era jets that the TANG were flying, it was decided that numerous "less fit" TANG pilots who might have trouble meeting tougher drug and alcohol standards and testing being imposed by the DOD were to be released early from duty. Meanwhile combat experienced pilots familiar with newer aircraft were going to be rotating into the TANG. While this sounded bad for Bush, it was in fact a broad based Pentagon policy launched in the wake of the Vietnam withdrawl as a means of coming to term with the 60's drug era. And there was a promise by the Pentagon to observe some levels of confidentiality at the time. Clearly the MSM failed to do their duty and inform the public concerning Bush's drinking and drug use history prior to the 2000 election. The Bushies were guilty of a lack of transparency just as the Obots are toda

No. The MSM produced a fraudulent document which brought down the heir to Walter Conkrite--Dan Rather. In that instance the MSM created a document to discredit the sitting president. In this instance, it is the lack of disclosure by the MSM and the "Transparency" promised by the current administration which obfuscates the truth. Either way, we are fucked as a country.

"Either way, we are fucked as a Country"? Well yes, but it's not over yet. A lot has to happen to recover from the onslaught at hand. Namely a true conservative needs to step up and get elected. Obama is WELL ON HIS WAY to setting Liberals and the Democratic Party back to the same position they were,and actually much worse than at the end of the Carter Administration. It clearly will get to the point where the MSM and the Dems will have to account for his crippling of the Economy, Health Care, soaring Energy cost, Lost jobs and the looming Amnesty just to name a few. I feel we need to abandon "globalism" "free trade" and the "free movement of labor" and instead circle the wagons and protect American jobs. Next threaten to stop imports if a even level of trade cannot be agreed upon. Or better yet, make it to our advantage. Sounds crazy? Fuck no! We need to recreate our manufacturing base. Add tarrifs to imports if they refuse to go along. Tax job outsourcing to the point of not being worth it. End all visa job taking programs. And repatriate the 30 million or more squatters already here......and guess what? With the slow and diliberate introduction of these protections for American citizens, we would eventually get back to work and back to producing products that say "Made In America". Besides thats the fucking job of these elected officials....to watch our ass. But if they continue on this 3 decade old path of greed and multiculti crapola.....then yes, we are fucked as a Country. Now get out of my lane, or get run over.

petty bourgeois I do not believe anybody has proved who created the Bush TANG forgeries. It does not appear that the MSM created the Bush forgeries then or the dubious Obama "COLB" now. Dan Rather foolishly ruined his career nonetheless. The Bush forgeries had the effect of ending perfectly legitmate inquiries into Bush's military service. Dubya and Karl Rove could not have asked for more. In both cases it is very possible that Bush operatives then and Obama operative now have been behind fraudulent documents and misleading testimony in order to bend a sycophantic MSM to their will and mislead the public.

Anonymous | 07.29.09 - 11:45 am = llamajockey

Your linking protocol is totally non-standard. You use the kookiest scheme I've ever seen which is to a) not hot link the URL's, or, you use an arcane shortner which then still has to redirect to a second site, before going to your reference. Here is what's bizarre: your written material is highly, highly dependent on your citations. But you make it uber laborious for the reader to even get to your citations. Objectively speaking, your site is cranky and not journalistic.

"Objectively speaking, your site is cranky and not journalistic." If the left has their propaganda, we can have ours too. Hasn't LaGuardia been dead for some years?

all the above are monkey butt's. Obama is our enemy and you monkey butt's put this monkey in office, by the way we have no country it ended in 1945. the next president will be more fun, and will be from mexican that would be total justice for all black people and many whites.

fiorello needs an uber tuber

Wow. You still won't link directly to the NRO article that forms the the basis for this blog post. Instead you use a URL shortner in parenthesis, that is itself not a live link. Perhaps you should have an explanatory note in the margin of your blog, something like "This blog does not observe linking protocols." Or perhaps you could try "This blog does not link because I don't like to drive traffic to the articles that form the subject of my posts."

LaGuardia does like the style. Tough shit. It has nothing to do with the sources being cited. Can't you find something relevant to complain about other than "linking protocols?"