"Dreier targeted on immigration"
Posted Sun, Oct 31, 2004 at 6:15 pm · short link
From the WashTimes:
On Monday November 1, John & Ken will be conducting a rally in front of Dreier's office in Glendora. I'd imagine it will be interesting to say the least. The rally runs from 3pm to 7pm.
They're asking their listeners to vote for Cynthia Matthews and Ed Laning instead of their opponents. This blog echoes those endorsements.
Help 24Ahead via PayPal:
House Rules Committee Chairman David Dreier is waging a furious re-election battle after he was targeted by a Los Angeles radio talk show as a "political human sacrifice" for his record on illegal immigration.If you want to complain to the NRCC about what appears to be an attempt to infringe on free speech rights, click here.
In the past month, Mr. Dreier and Republicans have spent an estimated $1 million to blanket his district with fliers and radio ads aimed at countering the massive "Fire Dreier" campaign led by "The John and Ken Show" on KFI-AM in Los Angeles.
Last week, Mr. Dreier, California Republican, and the National Republican Campaign Committee (NRCC) filed a Federal Elections Commission complaint (the-lonewacko-blog.redstate.org/story/2004/10/29/193325/19) against Clear Channel Inc., which owns KFI-AM...
On Monday November 1, John & Ken will be conducting a rally in front of Dreier's office in Glendora. I'd imagine it will be interesting to say the least. The rally runs from 3pm to 7pm.
They're asking their listeners to vote for Cynthia Matthews and Ed Laning instead of their opponents. This blog echoes those endorsements.
Tags:
Comments
Ontario Emperor (not verified)
Wed, 11/03/2004 - 10:24
Permalink
So Dreier won and Baca won. Perhaps the solution is to get Bill Jones to run against Dreier in the 2006 primary - NOT.
John S Bolton (not verified)
Sun, 10/31/2004 - 20:27
Permalink
correction: the above should read 'This is one of the most obviously indefensible policies'
John S Bolton (not verified)
Sun, 10/31/2004 - 20:21
Permalink
It is found necessary to attempt censorship on the issue of the mass immigration of undesirables, but not on any other question. This one of the most obviously indefensible policies; to pretend that adult illiterates are worth importing by the millions for potential citizenship, and on net public subsidy. That is why they need to try to censor those who mention the irrationality of such openness to aggression.
John S Bolton (not verified)
Sun, 10/31/2004 - 18:41
Permalink
This makes the Republican party look very disloyal to the citizenry; that they would throw such superabundance of resources in, to ward off the possibility of a defeat for a pro-mexican candidate.