The logical approach to anti-American MSM smear jobs
Posted Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 3:33 am
There has to be a (literally) logical, mathematical way to look at smear jobs by the MSM. Noam Chomsky probably has a way, but, would he help? Probably not. Thus, it falls to we amateurs to find a way.
Let's look at this article:
In the second paragraph the AP tries to give LULAC some credibility. Then, in the third paragraph they repeat a smear from the organization they've just set up as believable. Click on their name above to find out about this group that the AP is trying to present to you as credible.
And, the report also includes the following in which a legislator elected by citizens of the U.S. admits she's a Mexican:
Let's look at this article:
name: "Hundreds Protest N.M. Border Patrol Group"There has to be a better way, but let's take a look at what we have above. Once again, the AP repeats smears, then point out that the volunteers deny the smears. Why don't they just start printing something like, "The Minuteman volunteers denied beating their wives in the first place"? Of course, that would be just too obvious, thus the repeating of similar smears pointed out above.
source: AP
author: ALICIA A. CALDWELL
URL: full, full, full, modified1 (NYT), modified2 (KLTV)
Subjects: Minuteman Civil Defense Corps ("MCDC"), League of United Latin American Citizens ("LULAC")
Claim, para 1: AP says MCDC is "controversial"
Repeated Claim, para 1: marchers/LULAC call MCDC "racist and un-American"
Claim, para 2: AP says LULAC is "one of the oldest Latino civil rights organizations in the country"
Quote, para 3: LULAC national treasurer Jaime Martinez says, "It's a racist organization, there is no question... They say they will monitor the border, but now they are coming into our cities. Something has to be done".
Claim, para 4: AP says, "Minuteman volunteers... have repeatedly denied claims of racism."
Modified1: The NYT version doesn't include the bit highlighted below concerning Mary Jane Garcia.
Modified2: The KLTV version doesn't include that same bit. It does includes this interesting and important change. However, the "officials" aren't identified and it's not known whether they're lying or not:Elected officials from New Mexico and Texas decried the volunteer-based border patrol group as racist and un-American.
In the second paragraph the AP tries to give LULAC some credibility. Then, in the third paragraph they repeat a smear from the organization they've just set up as believable. Click on their name above to find out about this group that the AP is trying to present to you as credible.
And, the report also includes the following in which a legislator elected by citizens of the U.S. admits she's a Mexican:
Mary Jane Garcia, the majority whip of the New Mexico State Senate, called on the federal government to take action against the Minuteman volunteers and work on real reform of immigration laws.If Garcia is a Mexican, perhaps she should renounce her (presumed) American citizenship and run for office in Mexico.
Forcing Hispanic immigrants out of the country is not the answer, she said.
"What would happen if all the Mexicans were to leave this country tomorrow? They need us," she said.
Comments
Soggy Back (not verified)
Mon, 01/16/2006 - 14:20
Permalink
Interesting site erected by LULAC.
http://mestizoracists.blogspot.com/
perroazul del norte (not verified)
Sun, 07/24/2005 - 09:33
Permalink
"Mary Jane Garcia, the majority whip of the New Mexico State Senate, called on the federal government to take action against the Minuteman volunteers and work on real reform of immigration laws. "
The Minuteman are engaged in legal activity protected under the Constitution. So Sra. Gracia is calling on the federal government to violate their civil rights. Since civil rights don't exist in Mexico that is clearly where she belongs.
John S Bolton (not verified)
Sun, 07/24/2005 - 09:11
Permalink
The main mathematics here would be the rarity of indepent mindedness among those writing or getting quoted for such propaganda. This yields the repititions of the same party line, which has changed negligibly in over forty years. Say that anyone who disagrees with some leftist outrage is necessarily motivated by racial feeling against some physically identifiable group. The source of the similarity is that the left is promoting a cause for which no rational argument can be offered, which increases the aggression in society, especially against the net taxpayer. Quotas for minorities to get quoted in the news impose a further drastic reduction in independence of thought permitted on such issues. The only attempt at a rational argument in the above 'antiracist' quotes, was that there could be a sudden removal of all the Mexicans, a fantasy with no bearing on whether the government should allow protest of the lack of immigration law enforcement. Again the fantasy was not imagined individually, but mindlessly copied, with no mental processing as to whether we actually face any such dilemma. One new argument, or specious threat, has appeared, though; the suggestion that there might be a national strike of all the Mexicans, foreigners or illegal aliens. What you have really is regulated media pleading indirectly for censorship of immigration restrictionism. Apparently freedom of the press to these people means freedom to impose dictatorship.