.@RobQuigley: only thing "fake" about r/w outrage over Twitter censorship is their false claim only they're impacted. The real data at my top tweet shows Twitter censors ~20% to 50% of replies to Trump officials (many from libs). *That* harms USA, but you could care less.

@24AheadDotCom_ Right. Keep promoting your service

.@RobQuigley replies, just as you'd expect someone of his intellect to do, "Right. Keep promoting your service". I don't have a service Rob, it's an open source app. Writing it & promoting it has cost me a great deal of money, but I've done that as a public service.

.@RobQuigley: does the real data at my top tweet (the Samples section) show #Twitter heavily censors *all* kinds of users? That is, about as many libs as cons but also Target customers, Mike Trout/Bryce Harper/Ozil/etc fans, @PhillyD fans, etc. etc.? Yes or no, Rob?

The White House should be looking at how to stifle Russian trolls active in elections. Instead WH works with righ… https://t.co/KTIqrJaykv

"Trolls" in Russia were sent to Siberia. Portraying dissenters as "trolls", "bots", etc. is a lite version of that. If Americans fall for influence operators, simply stifling them is bandaid MT @RobQuigley WH should be looking at how to stifle Russian trolls active in elections