.@EEFWW: OTOH, if O'Connor ignores my open letter (or responds stupidly), I'll work to discredit him too. @WritersOnTrump @L_o_T13

.@EEFWW: @WritersOnTrump open letter is a weak plea to <1% of voters. There's no penalty to anyone for ignoring it. @L_o_T13

Are you a writer? Are you against Trump's running for President? https://t.co/tTnyQ3nJC7 You don't need to be a writer to sign this. Anyone.

.@EEFWW @L_o_T13: AFAICT, @WritersOnTrump has no action plan to stop Trump. They're just about in-group posturing. Correct me if wrong.

@24AheadDotCom_ I don't think you quite understand the point of an open letter. @L_o_T13 @WritersOnTrump

.@EEFWW: if you scroll back you'll see I just posted open letter. Unlike @WritersOnTrump, it has an action plan. That's important. @L_o_T13

@24AheadDotCom_ No—when I scroll back,I see 2 tweets by you to me,w/zero links.No open letter,w/or w/o action plan. @WritersOnTrump @L_o_T13

.@EEFWW: the open letter in question: http://24ahead.com/n/12126 He either responds or I use him not responding to undercut him to his fans.

@24AheadDotCom_ How is "A challenge for Larry O'Connor of Hot Air" about journalists not asking HRC tough questions relevant?

.@EEFWW: I want HotAir's O'Connor to pressure NYT hacks so they'll use their access to ask Hillary (or Trump or...) real questions.

.@EEFWW: if he doesn't, then I'll make him pay by discrediting him to his followers (& continue doing the same with the #NYT hacks).

.@EEFWW: NRA, BLM, illegal aliens, and others all do great at forcing pols to do what they want. @WritersOnTrump isn't in their league.