Sojourners deletes comment showing how Jim Wallis can't be trusted (immigration) UPDATE: they banned me too

If you trust Jim Wallis or the Sojourners organization, please keep reading. A couple of days ago I left the comment below on one of his blog entries [1]. Despite not violating any provisions of their "Code of Conduct" (printed at [2]), the comment was deleted. Apparently showing how at least Wallis' position on immigration is that of a charlatan is too much for them.

Unlike Sojourners, this site has an open comments policy, and I'm contacting Sojourners and inviting them to indicate in comments below a) what possible legitimate reason they could have for deleting the comment, and b) what possible legitimate reason they could have for following someone whose policies would make the situation worse for the people of the U.S. and of Mexico and other sending countries.

[1] The comment was left at blog.sojo.net/2010/04/21/video-jim-wallis-talks-about-arizonas-new-immigration-bill-on-cnn and follows:

----------------- BEGIN COMMENT -------------------
You can't trust Jim Wallis, and I'll tell you why. He supports "reform", and that "reform" is being sold as having enforcement provisions. Yet, he wants to completely undercut the enforcement provisions in what he supports.

If someone promotes, say, fining polluters but doesn't tell you about all the loopholes, can you trust them? Of course not.

The huge loophole Wallis wants is on the first video, where he says "enforcement that breaks up families is unacceptable to us." What that means is that anyone who came here illegally and had a U.S. citizen child - as millions have - would get a ticket to stay. Mexicans aren't dumb, even if many like Wallis treat them like children. They'll quickly figure out the "Wallis rule" and know that if they have a child here they won't be deported.

And, Wallis isn't telling you about that.

Not only that, but Wallis also engages in false compassion: he complains about border deaths while supporting policies that will lead to even more border deaths.

Please go to one of his appearances and press him on what he's not revealing and on what's at the link on video, then upload it to Youtube.
----------------- END COMMENT -------------------

[2] Here's their Code of Conduct at the sojo link:

I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of the Sojourners online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)

I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)

I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)

I will hold others accountable by clicking "report" on comments that violate these principles, based not on what ideas are expressed but on how they're expressed. (2 Thessalonians 3:13-15)

I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by Sojourners staff and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)

4/24/10 UPDATE: I left the comment again, with a preface noting that it had been deleted on the earlier thread. Not surprisingly, the second comment was deleted also:
blog.sojo.net/2010/04/23/
anti-immigrant-law-passes-in-arizona-we-will-not-comply

5/3/10 UPDATE: The lil' fascists have banned me too; I logged in to disqus to comment on one of their entries and got a "The site has blocked you from posting new comments" message.