.@issielapowsky: you quote @onurvarol like he's a credible source, referencing his Botometer. It's designed to quash debate. It's also incredibly flawed such as claiming there's a 40% chance Jake Tapper is a bot. _Grammar_ - an actual bot - is only slightly higher.

.@issielapowsky: based on the results, would you say *how* @GitHub, @EFF, etc. supported #NetNeutrality was effective? Were their tactics - texts, guitarmy or similar childish stunts, street protests, etc. - effective? Should they keep repeating kids' stuff expecting diff result?