1996: "Building Aztlan: Chicano Movement Springs Back to Life" (187flashback)

The extended entry has a disturbing article that appeared in the apparently considered-mainstream journal "Black Issues in Higher Education". For future reference.

This is especially an interesting article for MEChA/reconquista apologists.

Building Aztlan: Chicano Movement Springs Back to Life
Rodriguez, Roberto. Black Issues in Higher Education Reston:Apr 4, 1996. Vol. 13, Iss. 3, p. 22

Some Chicano scholars say the beginning of the Chicano activist movement was the defense of Tenochtitlan (now Mexico City) in 1521, which pitted the indigenous Mexican population against Spanish invaders. Others define it as the end of the Mexican-American War in 1848, when Mexico lost half of its territory to the United States and Mexican residents became, as one scholar put it, "strangers in their own land."

Little scholarly disagreement exists, however, as to the time frame of the emergence of the modern Chicano movement -- it can be directly pegged to the mid-1960s, a time coinciding with the last great thrust of the Black civil rights movement.

In essence, the Chicano movement embodied an across-the-board push for civil and human rights that placed an emphasis on increased entry, presence and relevance in the racially barricaded and cloistered bastions of American higher education. This led to colleges and universities becoming targets of protest -- and a resultant opening of doors and minds that led to the creation of Chicano studies.

Ada Sosa-Riddell, director of the Chicana/Latina Center at the University of California-Davis, says that Chicano studies represents one of the long-lasting legacies of the Chicano movement. However, with the advent of the anti-affirmative action mood of the country, she says, danger is in the air.

"But you can't destroy Chicano studies. You would have to burn the literature," says Sosa-Riddell.

In fact, many scholars maintain that the anti-immigrant, anti-affirmative action stance of politicians nationwide has been responsible for a resurgence of Chicano activism on campus.

Purposefully Pursued Agenda

During the 1960s, the Chicano movement was actually comprised of several components: boycotts to improve the lives of farm workers; demonstrations to end Jim Crow-style segregation and police repression; demands for land-grant equity; protests to improve educational opportunities; and organizing for political representation and self-determination.

In time, other areas of concern were added, such as: gender equality, access to higher education and immigrant rights. A cultural rebirth was proclaimed, triggered by a rediscovery and appreciation of meztizo/indigenous roots and a positive self-definition.

This cumulative activist agenda became popularly known as the Brown Power movement. An important psychological component of this major Chicano effort of self-assertion and determination was often misunderstood, or not known by, the general population. It was known as "building Aztlan" -- or nationhood.

To many Chicanos, Aztlan -- which is derived from the name of the Aztec homeland, Aztlan -- represents the U.S. Southwest and what they believed was the ancestral homeland stolen from Mexico during the Mexican-American War. Although there were those in the movement who literally interpreted this notion as reclamation of this "lost land" by fighting for an independent, sovereign nation (even from Mexico), all involved in the movement interpreted "building Aztlan" as a spiritual building -- or bonding -- of a people on common ground.

`Competing Definitions'

The 1960s and `70s were an exciting time, says Lea Ybarra, associate provost for academic affairs at California State University-Fresno. "We felt we could make a difference."

Ybarra enrolled at CSU-Fresno (then known as Fresno State University) in the mid-1960s when there were only a handful of Chicano and Chicana students. Today, there are more than 4,000.

Luis Arroyo, professor and chair of Chicano and Latino studies at California State University-Long Beach, says that the Chicano movement was unified when it was simply a movement for dignity and self-respect.

But, he contends, once an attempt was made to give the movement an ideology, "We began to develop competing definitions as to what the movement was."

To this day, those competing definitions continue to shape how scholars define what the movement was or wasn't, when it started, when and if it ended and what it should be.

The Missing Generations

What differentiates the Chicano movement from earlier Mexican civil rights struggles is its national character, its mass nature and its strong student base at colleges and universities.

Prior to World War II, Mexican Americans were virtually invisible on college campuses. It was not until the 1960s -- as a result of educational opportunity programs -- that Chicanos streamed onto campuses in unprecedented numbers.

Their prior absence was generally due to discrimination in the educational system. The exception, particularly in the 19th century, were the children of landed elites.

As such, there was no intellectual tradition in the Mexican-American community in higher education similar to that which exists in the African-American community. The reason, says Carlos MuAaoz, Chicano studies professor at the University of California-Berkeley, is that because after the Mexican-American War, whites did not feel a responsibility to educate Mexican Americans. Thus, there was never a push to create Mexican-American colleges, similar to the Black colleges, says the author of "Youth, Identity and Power," a book that chronicles the Chicano movement.

Absent a large presence in higher education, Mexican-American scholars debated the issues of the day in newspapers, as opposed to lecture halls.

Arturo Madrid, the Murchison Distinguished Professor of Humanities at Trinity University in San Antonio, TX, says that contrary to popular belief there is an untapped wealth of literature in Mexico about the Mexican-origin population in the United States prior to 1960. During the 1950s, the era of McCarthyism, large-scale deportations of Mexicans were both indiscriminate and selectively targeted against Mexican political, labor and community leaders -- "against anyone that was suspect," he says.

With a few exceptions, the effect was to leave in place a less combative Mexican-American intellectual leadership, says Madrid.

Movement Linkage

Felix Gutierrez, director of the Freedom Forum's Pacific Media Center, whose parents were journalists and student-activists during the 1930s through the 1950s, says that political activism has always been a part of the Mexican-American community. "What people were talking about in the 1960s, we were living in the 1950s," he says.

Gutierrez himself represents a link between an organization known as the "Mexican-American Movement" from the 1930s to the 1950s (and whose motto was "Progress through Education") and the 1960s movement. He, along with Ralph Guzman, were the faculty advisors for the first United Mexican American Student organization at California State University-Los Angeles.

While Gutierrez sees the birth of the Chicano movement as a resurgence of the earlier 1930s-50s movement, he distinguishes the 1960s as "a period of turbulence."

One of the principal parts of the country where that turbulence manifested itself was in Crystal City, TX, where, in 1963, Chicanos took over the City Council in a part of the country that had long been dominated by an agricultural elite.

The Chicano activists' mission at that time -- as documented in the book "MAYO: Avant-Garde to the Chicano Movement in Texas" by University of California-Riverside Professor Armando Navarro -- "was to eliminate and replace the gringo," says Jose Angel Gutierrez, director of the Center for Mexican American Studies at the University of Texas-Arlington.

Struggling against Jim Crow institutions, Chicano activists also won school board elections in South Texas, but soon found out that Anglos remained embedded in power as teachers and administrators. This knowledge, says Angel Gutierrez, is what triggered the creation of La Raza Unida Party -- the first and only political party for Chicanos: "We became the electoral arm of the Chicano movement."

Black Civil Rights Ties

Elizabeth Martinez, author of "500 Years of Chicano History" and a past director of the New York chapter of the Student Non-violent Coordinating Committee (SNCC), says that the Chicano movement had more than symbolic links with the Black civil rights movement.

Martinez notes that in 1965, as a member of SNCC, she delivered a speech at the historic farm worker's march from Delano, CA, to Sacramento -- in solidarity with the United Farm Workers union. In 1968, on behalf of SNCC, she traveled to Albuquerque to connect with the Chicano land struggle in New Mexico and to help found the newspaper, El Grito del Norte (The Cry of the North). "I went for two weeks and I stayed for eight years," she says.

Movement Resurges

Many scholars maintain that ever since the death of farm labor leader Cesar Chavez in 1993 there has been a resurgence in the Chicano movement, particularly at colleges and universities nationwide.

This new activism peaked in 1994 when hundreds of thousands of junior and senior high and college students across the country walked out of schools and held marches and rallies in opposition to California's anti-immigrant Proposition 187. "The mass mobilization against 187 reaffirmed the need to be unified," says Angela Acosta, a graduate student at the University of New Mexico.

"The Chicano movement shaped my life," says Acosta. Yet, as someone who worked against 187, she believes the new movement is no longer limited to Chicanos but encompasses Latinos, immigrants and other people of color.

Genevieve Aguilar, a senior at Hanks High School in El Paso, says the Chicano movement is "definitely not dead" -- that it lives in students like herself who battle against people who believe that racism no longer exists and who don't see a need for Chicano or Latino programs.

When students ask Aguilar, who has been a member of the education-oriented National Hispanic Institute since she was in the ninth-grade, why there isn't an institute for whites, she has a ready answer.

"There is: It's called government."

Comments

I agree, but genetics cannot count for all of the disparities.

Yes, of course not. Here the evidence is also quite clear: environment, in the broadest sense of that term, also plays a part, and the achievement gap can be reduced. But: there is absolutely no evidence it can be significantly reduced (much less eliminated), where 'significant' means to a level that would dampen calls for things like affirmative action. Example: for an ultra-competitive prize like admission to medical school, without affirmative action there would be almost no Hispanics admitted to medical school in California, a result which would never be accepted politically, given their rapidly rising, soon-to-be-the-majority share of California's population (and their ethnic militancy and obtuseness).

And this...irreducibility is, almost certainly, due to the genetic component of the gap. IMO the evidence on this is already quite clear and convincing, and is only being strengthened, e.g. via modern computational genetics/genomics.

(And it should be presumptuousness.)

Just to clarify, I was speakig of the atmosphere in the 1800s, not today.

Yes.

Regarding anti-semitism, the effects were lingering; for example, a film like Gentleman's Agreement.

I agree, but genetics cannot count for all of the disparities. Even the most eugenic scholars concede that environment (including nutrition and parental guidance) plays a part in overall performance. However, genetic differences probably explain why black admissions at UCLA are so dismally low.

Also, look at the national IQ of Hong Kong versus their performance in American schools, if you would like to see who will give the jews some competition in the academy. Due to their enviroment, they have quite a bit more IQ points than mainland Chinese. Why such a better environment? Capitalism, my friend. Also see Taiwan versus Cuba since 1940: two islands roughly the same size at the same starting point since 1940, but one is immensely successful while the other languishes in its American currency and kerosene-powered 1950's era Chevrolets.

As for the 1800's, I always like to re-read Karl Marx "On the Jewish Question" to remind me of how anti-semitic Marxism really is. We must punish success whenever possible, especially in California.

But since none of us were around in the 1800's, we cannot be held responsible for the errors of our ancestors for whatever injustice had occurred. Punishing future generations of Americans for the dastardly work of long dead people is not an American ideal by any stretch of the imagination. We were just born into this mess, we didn't create it.

Just to clarify, I was speakig of the atmosphere in the 1800s, not today.

Chicano scholars

I cannot attest to the other schools, but I can say without qualification that there has never been a shortage of jewish intellectuals occupying our best schools.

In fact, Jews are widely overrepresented in all of the professions; people noticing this has always been one of the drivers of anti-semitism. And they always will be, due to their higher average intelligence. Which is the same reason Hispanics will always be underrepresented.

You can only blame "discrimination" for so long.

One would think so. But because of the intractable (i.e. in large part genetic) nature of these group differences, in a competitive, egalitarian society -- which the US purports to be -- you will always end up with this under- and overrepresentation problem. But given the general reluctance to acknowledge that differences in group intelligence (and so economic outcome) are significantly genetic, i.e. not due to discrimination, this probably has legs yet.

Yet, as someone who worked against 187, she believes the new movement is no longer limited to Chicanos but encompasses Latinos, immigrants and other people of color.

There's some really ugly ignorance and presumptiousness behind this kind of 'thinking'.

"Academics" and "mainstream" are not consistent with each other. The only places where ideas do not have to work is the academy. There is a chasm between "town" and "gown."

I cannot attest to the other schools, but I can say without qualification that there has never been a shortage of jewish intellectuals occupying our best schools. Brandeis has always been a hub of counter-culturalism (inherently anti-American) and gave us "scholars" such as Angela Davis, and the whole realm of alternative truths that come with it.

Jim Crow has been gone for a long, long time. You can only blame "discrimination" for so long. See how white Americans are treated in mexico (and on our campuses by the mexican elite) if you want evidence of discrimination. Armando Navarro preaches genocide (literally). His ideas are unconscionable and should be condemned.

really what is happening here is mexicans want to make a free world for the drug dealers. mexico and the third world are evil and if you don't fight back in the "old way", that evil will kill you!

This so called chicano/latino thing! is a cover for evil mexican rule over all who stand against evil doers like in mexico city and its helper washington D.C. ASK WHY ARE OUR BORDERS STILL OPENED WHY DO THE RATS IN WASHINGTON HATE OUR FREEDOMS? AND DUTIES?

Don't be P.C. IT KILLED THIS NATION HAS KILLED THIS NATION.

It is a mainstream academic journal.

It is my understanding that the Jews started universities like Brandeis, the Irish founded Notre Dame, all because of discrimination. IOW they did it themselves, to become part of America, not to destroy it! The Black colleges were founded after the Civil War because many people understood that slavery and its after effects were wrong and black people were US citizens.