People forget that the natives of what was to become Mexico never had any claim to what is now the American Southwest. The Aztecs, which were the dominant civilization in Mexico when the Spanish came and conquered it, never occupied the southwest. A large number of other, very distinct native tribes occupied this part of the continent, and none of these had any relation to the Aztecs, other than in a racial sense. They had completely different cultures and spoke different languages. On top of that, the Aztecs, who occupied central Mexico, were despised by essentially every other Indian group they had contact with. One of the very reasons that Cortez was able to conquer them so quickly was because so many other Indians wanted the Aztecs destroyed and consequently allied with the Spaniards.

Mexico only came to hold territory in the Southwest because in the late 18th century the Spanish decided to expand their empire and forcibly missionized the territory. Spain was also fearful of acquisition of the land by Russia. At the end of the Mexican war of independence in 1821, which coincided with the end of the missionization era, the victorious Mexicans simply "inherited" that land. Twenty-five years later, the U.S. took that land from Mexico.

Now, Mexicans (representing the descendents of the conquered Aztecs and their European former conquerors) want Americans to think that North America was occupied by one big, monolithic, harmonious "Indian Civilization," and that Mexico therefore has some sort of claim over American territory. Nothing could be further from the truth. These Indian civilizations were about as unified as all the various countries of Europe or Africa or Asia, and the natives of Mexico were among the most isolated and hated.

Why stop even there, George? Since ALL of the original "colonists" of the North and South American continents were from central Asia, why not cede all of both continents to the two countries in that general area - Russia and China.

And then why stop even THERE? Since those areas of central Asia were settled by people from east Africa who left Africa around 80,000 years ago, why not cede all of both continenets AND central Asia and for that matter Europe and SE Asia, and all of the Pacific and Australia, etc. etc. to eastern Africa? It could certainly buck up eastern Africa's prospects!

why not George sounds good to me! why not just handed over this nation to all so called immigrant groups and see what happens? the fact is white's have no will to keep a nation under laws! the so called mexicans want only one thing, and that is what you have without working for it.
the asia's ( read chinese reds helping mexico and bin laden and who are sent here as spy's) want the same and our other brothers what most white's ( read males ) dead.

the people who will be deported in this end game are the whites but not really deported but put in a death camp with the help of our so called government who will do anything to keep peace and power, if you think that is nuts keep watching over the next years if we have that long.

Why not go further. While they weren't recent immigrant groups (they migrated from Asia some 20,000 years ago) the descendants of the Aztecs and Mayans may have priority consideration for claim to the land over Hispanics as an ethnic group. Maybe only Mexicans of Mayan and Aztec blood ought to own Mexican land. All Hispanics without native blood could be excluded from all of Mexico, for that matter. I guess they'd have to be deported.

It looks as though Navarro wants to instigate the same crude tribal strife that occurred before the world developed some semblence of international law.