Ingraham lists Paul Nehlen as one of many "prominent voices censored on social media". Here's a link to Paul Neh… https://t.co/YgvKlsfhk4

@bad_takes @chick_in_kiev The whole schtick of modern conservatism is to mask substantive agreements with white sup… https://t.co/aCXtHZrP2Q

.@numidianflank: @bad_takes is very pro-censorship. Today Nehlen, tomorrow he'll be burning a cookbook or something. Be a real liberal. And, instead of Brenden Karet, seek out leaders who are smart enough to just show Nehlen wrong. Because Karet isn't.

@24AheadDotCom_ @bad_takes that the distance between an actual white supremacist and a cook book is so small for yo… https://t.co/CrMrsLbvdJ

.@numidianflank replies "that the distance between an actual white supremacist and a cook book is so small for you is extraordinary". When it comes to opposing censorship, there is no difference and there *has to be* no difference. Once again: be a real liberal.

@24AheadDotCom_ Facebook isn't the government, and you live in an absolute fantasy world if you think them banning… https://t.co/fbw90FfZLX

.@numidianflank: actually, the damage to the USA in banning Paul Nehlen is much, much greater than allowing him to speak. If he speaks, he can be shown wrong. If he isn't allowed to speak, his ideas fester underground & break out in unexpected ways.