FWIW: Berg says has tape of Obama's grandmother discussing BHO's birth in Kenya

Picture a gigantic, flashing neon sign saying, "it might be true, but we need actual evidence" as you read this:
[Philip J. Berg, Democrat and a former deputy attorney general for Pennsylvania] has confirmed he has a recording of a telephone call from the senator's paternal grandmother confirming his birth in Kenya...

..."This has been a real sham he's pulled off for the last 20 months," Berg told Savage. "I'll release it [the tape] in a day or two, affidavits from her talking to a certain person. I heard the tape. She was speaking [to someone] here in the United States."
Just release it now, all these people keep promising things down the road which never happen. While Berg is probably more credible than API, those who make allegations like this have to come up with the goods.


I guess I haven't yet seen a definitive declaration or (court) decision about what it means to be a 'natural born citizen'. Clearly his mother was one, and in the minds of some people -- maybe even most people, including me (not 100% sure) -- this is enough to qualify him on that count (which is the only thing in dispute, as far as I know), i.e no matter where he was born. But I know there is some precedent about this, i.e. I know there are residency requirements, and this is related to where one is born. But I think he satisfies these. It would be great if someone could enlighten me about all of this. In the meantime I will google.

i hope this disqualification goes through. Global markets may also be panicking over the prospect of a left administration with inadequate military.

Berg will release the tape right after he releases the proof that controlled demolitions brought down the twin towers. That was his previous obsession, remember?

_Berg will release the tape right after he releases the proof that controlled demolitions brought down the twin towers._ Maybe if the government's multi-million dollar 'investigation' of 9/11 had included a plausible explanation of why WTC-7 -- which was not hit by an airplane or significantly damaged by debris from the north tower -- collapsed in what looks EXACTLY LIKE A CONTROLLED IMPLOSION people like Berg would have shut up a long time ago. In the absence of such, I don't blame people for thinking that if it looks like a duck and walks like a duck it must be a duck. Not to mention the rather odd doings of Atta et al in Florida. [1]

[1] www.madcowprod.com/blog/documentaries.html

Maybe because that's what happens when a building that size comes down. What's it supposed to do, tip over like a tree that's been sawed through at the base? Center of gravity means that when a building goes down, it's going to go straight down, with one floor pancaking down on top of the next. The "controlled" part of a controlled demolition just means using the minimum amount of force necessary to cause this, instead of blowing chunks of mortar and metal all over the place. In the absence of something like explosives, a building that goes down is just going to collapse on itself. Saying "it didn't take enough damage for that" is just ridiculous. Clearly it did. The very fact that the manner of the building collapses foiled peoples' expectations is a pretty good example of why they're most likely to be true. It's the same thing as the moon landing... people expect there to be stars in the background, they expect to see the flag hanging lifelessly, etc. If somebody had spent a lot of time and money faking a moon shot, they would have got those details "right".