"CFR's Plan to Integrate the U.S., Mexico and Canada"

Phyllis Schlafly:
The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) has just let the cat out of the bag about what's really behind our trade agreements and security partnerships with the other North American countries. A 59-page CFR document spells out a five-year plan for the "establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security community" with a common "outer security perimeter."

...The experience of the European Union and the World Trade Organization makes it clear that a common market requires a court system, so the CFR document calls for "a permanent tribunal for North American dispute resolution." Get ready for decisions from non-American judges who make up their rules ad hoc and probably hate the United States anyway.

The CFR document calls for allowing Mexican trucks "unlimited access" to the United States, including the hauling of local loads between U.S. cities. The CFR document calls for adopting a "tested once" principle for pharmaceuticals, by which a product tested in Mexico will automatically be considered to have met U.S. standards.

The CFR document demands that we implement "the Social Security Totalization Agreement negotiated between the United States and Mexico." That's code language for putting illegal aliens into the U.S. Social Security system, which is bound to bankrupt the system.

Here's another handout included in the plan. U.S. taxpayers are supposed to create a major fund to finance 60,000 Mexican students to study in U.S. colleges...
There's much more at the link, and see also "Charlie Norwood on CATO's latest anti-American proposal" and "Think of yourself as a North American, citizen".

If Bush is helping to bring about a "North American Community", shouldn't he be impeached? It wouldn't necessarily be a victory for "liberals" if pro-America conservatives were the ones who lead the charge.


These are unspeakably traitorous proposals, which can only be motivated by hatred against human achievement. How do they expect us, as citizens, to value such a radical devaluation of our citizenship? Wouldn't that be a rather obvious contradiciton in terms? If someone has built up or achieved something, the way to respond to this is to try to swamp it with Mexican failure and welfare grabbing? Diverting the people's tax money to the foreigner fits the definition of treason. The Mexican contributes little or nothing to our social security system, yet can be allowed to draw untold hundreds of billions from it in a few decades, if this goes through ? How many Spanish speaking colleges do they propose to build for the welfarization of 60,000 young foreigners from Mexico? The increase of aggression on the net taxpayer is evil; therefore this scheme is evil.