July 08, 2006

Why does the Washington Post support illegal immigration?

The WaPo reports on the difficult journey of a Guatemalan who wants to enter the U.S. illegally ("Meeting Danger Well South of the Border" by N.C. Aizenman). Since the Washington Post has endorsed illegal immigration, isn't their article a bit in bad taste? Shouldn't they try to keep under wraps the nitty gritty details of what they in effect support? Or, do they hope that enough of their readers are over-emotional and under-rational enough to be unable to figure things out?

UPDATE: Sully links but offers little opining. In the past he's supported illegal immigration.

Posted to Immigration at July 8, 2006 01:43 PM

Comments

the washington post is told to support mexico and its people and its told to support the third world attack on this non nation, its the enemy guy! as bush and most of congress are told to do evil to you!by the way do you know what john murtha is up to now? for mexico city?

Posted by: Fred Dawes at July 8, 2006 02:09 PM

Lonewacko

Non-"liberal" coverage of immigration, Iraq, terrorism, multiculturalism, Los Angeles, California, privacy, and occasionally celebrities and wacky humor...

« Ralph Reed, former illegal immigration enabler «

» Macarena Hernandez: PIIPP pimping DREAM Act »