Non-"liberal" coverage of immigration, politics, media bias, multiculturalism, Los Angeles, California, privacy, and occasionally celebrities and wacky humor...
If you can't find what you're looking for, see the About page.
Atom feed · RSS 2.0 feed · RSS 0.91 feed · WML
Search
Note: only a fraction of the content has so far been tagged.
Categories
Immigration 2008a · Immigration 2007b · Immigration 2007a · Immigration · Immigration (6/05 to 12/05) · Immigration (1/05 to 6/05) · Immigration (8/04 to 12/04) · Immigration (before 8/04) · Immigration & Terrorism · Immigration & Driver's Licenses · Immigration & Consuls · Immigration & Media Bias · Immigration & Europe · North American Union
Blogging Across America
MultiCulti Madness ·
General Politics ·
Privacy ·
Miscellaneous ·
The "Peace" Movement
Los Angeles ·
California ·
Outdoors and sports ·
Celebrities ·
Wackiness ·
Inside Blogging
Iraq ·
Beltway Sniper ·
Terrorism & Extremism ·
The Saudis ·
Warblogging ·
War On Drugs
Archives
Latest
Comments
Yes, there are major differences. However, from the employer's perspective and speaking only in economic terms, employing illegal aliens is a better deal. There are some aspects of the various guest worker programs that are somewhat similar to indentured servitude, such as having to work a number of years to get citizenship.
And:
historyguy.com/slave_rebellions_usa.htm
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slave_rebellions
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_riots
Posted by: TLB at Apr 18, 2006 10:41 PM
Slaves wouldn't force a political change either.
Posted by: Smitty at Apr 18, 2006 9:12 PM
That's the problem...Illegals shouldn't have a "choice" to come here, and once they had sneaked in, they shouldn't be given a "choice" to stay.
Posted by: boofugg at Apr 18, 2006 7:38 PM
Well, slavery involves kidnapping and holding people against their will. Illegals freely choose to come here.
Posted by: AWCIII at Apr 18, 2006 10:41 AM