Arizona libertarians collaborating with Mexican government official
From this:The marchers in the Immigration Rally in Phoenix, Arizona, will get some unexpected information during their protest outside the state capitol on Monday. Along with the many leaflets and flyers promoting one agenda or another, many of them received little cards, introducing them to the concepts of libertarianism, free society and open borders, in a sort of "reverse reconquista" maneuver.Is it time to start putting the "u" back in collaborater yet?
These "Philosophia de Libertad" (Philosophy of Liberty) cards will contain links to websites containing further information, including a flash presentation on the basic principles of free society. The cards are being handed out by local Libertarian activist Ernest Hancock and the Representante del Gobernador de Sonora, Ricardo Valenzuela, along with a number of their friends, family members, and fellow liberty-activists.
Hancock is a current candidate for Secretary of State of Arizona, as well as a contender for the Chairmanship of the national Libertarian Party. Valenzuela was appointed by the Governor of Sonora, Mexico, as his official Representative in Arizona...
He reportedly says his actions in this event have the support of Governor Bours...
On a lighter note, from Hancock's bio (warning: received prompt from Firefox about it trying to load strange files) this is his list of political experience:
Candidate, United States House of Representatives, 2000
Candidate, United States House, Arizona District 4, 1998
Candidate, Secretary of State, 1994
Candidate, Arizona House, District 18, 1990, 1992, and 1996
Plaintiff, Numerous Law Suits Against the Governemnt for Constitutional Violations, 1991-1998
Chair, Malicopa County Libertarian Party, 1994-1995, 1998.
Possibly related:
- "Why I Am Running For Lieutenant Governor"
- Blog: Local, unimportant Democratic activists to make Libertarian Party slightly less irrelevant
- City of Tucson partners with Guadalajara; "Regional Economic Integration" with Mexican state (Sonora)
- Arizona: "Graf rips Kolbe at candidate forum"
- S.744 Immigration bill - Sec. 3609: RESPONSIBILITIES OF SECRETARY OF STATE
Immigration · Thu, 04/13/2006 - 07:24 · Importance: 1
- Want more coverage? Sponsor posts here
- Help hold politicians accountable: promote the plan to intellectually engage politicians by asking them tough questions on video. Take a few minutes right now and promote that plan.
- Tired of CNN's bogus debates? Help promote policy debates, with experts - not newscasters - quizzing politicians about the downsides and side-effects of their policies.
- Actually, there is a debate about skilled immigration.
- Vote up this plan to get immigration enforcement considered as a way to reduce unemployment.
- How to stop amnesty and minimize illegal immigration
- To reduce illegal immigration, discredit intermediaries
- How to ask politicians tough questions
- Get anti-"Birthers" to take this test
- Join the TiredOfTeaParty page on Facebook
- Follow FWD US (Forward US) is wrong
- Topics - easy-to-use categorized listing of our 9,000+ posts since 2002
- Top topics
- How and why the Teaparty movement should be opposed.
Random topics:
- 12/01/2002: More shocking American ignorance
- 06/06/2004: Scenes from a donut shop
- 09/05/2006: "Immigration Protests May Not Spur Votes"
- 04/08/2008: James Parks/AFL-CIO, Jennifer Ludden/NPR promote bad, inhumane public policy, illegal immigration
- 02/23/2004: Teresa Heinz-Kerry plus... Ken "Kenny Boy" Lay?
- 09/30/2004: 9/30 Debate thread
- 10/12/2008: "Iraqi Billionaire Threatens Reporters Investigating Rezko Affair" (Nadhmi Auchi)
- 10/29/2006: Anti-North American Union resolution introduced
- 03/03/2005: A minor scandal at the KC Star?
- 11/08/2004: Dreier confronted; L.A. Times serious and stupid
- Illegal immigration: an introduction
- See the top posts in the last 45 days.
- Monthly archives
- Here are five things you can do about the Obama administration's lawsuit over Arizona's immigration law.
- Need a correction? Spot an error? Post about it here
- See the Assignment Desk.
It may be that what they have in common is that both want war here. The Mexican hopes to gain territory; while the anarcholibertarian delights in war for its own sake. If not so, what is the meaning of offering 'competing providers of protection', to the exclusion of legitimate authority and sovereignty, as a political ideal? Competition for sovereignty is war; war as an ongoing, and idealized, even permanent state of affairs, is what that would mean. Hopefully everyone will notice that those who want freedom for aggression, even to the point of idealizing permanent warfare, are the most enthusiastic for the illegal immigration.