Independent, in-depth coverage of immigration, politics, and media bias since 2002. Also: multiculturalism, Los Angeles, California, privacy, and occasionally celebrities and wacky humor...
If you can't find what you're looking for, see the About page or use the navigation features to the right.
Comments
if we take that argument and expand it a little, why don't we just go ahead and give it all back to the indians, or morerather, the grizzly bear, sabertooth tiger and wooley mammoth?
i would love to see this theory applied in europe or africa.....
Posted by: calypso catteraugus at Jan 18, 2006 10:29 AM
There is no reason to assume that current generations of Latinos would have inherited anything. The government is wrong to increase the aggression on living citizens for any reason, and thus also to do so for the aggrandizement of those whose claim to have been otherwise in line to inherit something,if history had turned down a different course.
Posted by: John S Bolton at Jan 15, 2006 11:38 AM
I'm with Lonewacko on this; it's your turf if you have the manpower and the will to defend it. Alas, a number of my fellow Americans are eager to give away the American southwest to Mexico. But it's not theirs to give away.
Posted by: dchamil at Jan 15, 2006 7:04 AM