Why does President George Bush support CAFTA?

Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-CO) doesn't mention Our Leader in the editorial "CAFTA undermines immigration laws", but what he points out that's buried in the 1000-page agreement gives a clue to why Bush strongly supports it:
...One article of CAFTA reads, "Cross-border trade in services or cross-border supply of services means the supply of a service ... by a national of a party in the territory of another party." CAFTA goes on to stipulate that member nations take care to ensure that local and national "measures relating to qualification requirements and procedures, technical standards and licensing requirements do not constitute unnecessary barriers to trade in services," and to guarantee that our domestic laws are "not in themselves a restriction on the supply of the service."

What those provisions mean is that a foreign company would be empowered under CAFTA to challenge the validity of our immigration laws. If an international tribunal rules against us, Congress would then be forced to change our immigration laws or face international trade sanctions. These tribunals have the authority to rule that U.S. immigration limits, visa requirements, or even licensing requirements and zoning rules are "unnecessary burdens to trade" that act as "restrictions on the supply of a service."

This hidden legislation to open the U.S. border is only the beginning...


It is clearly unconstitutional to give away sovereignty like this, and without the supermajority senate approval. It is underhanded and traitorous, to pretend that they aren't trying to give away what morality does not permit. It represents hatred against success, to want to globalize down towards central american standards. It is a gross subversion of morality to try to enforce a privilege of failure to invade and destroy success.