A. Because Blogs For Bush has been nominated for 'Best Republican Party Coverage' by the Washington Post in their 2004 Best Blogs -- Politics and Elections Readers' Choice Awards!!

Perusing that site occasionally, I'm forced to ask, "is this a satire?" While it's apparently a group site, they all seem to speak with one unswerving messianic voice preaching the coming dominion of a second Bush term. While there are no people who call themselves "Kerryacs," and even the most ardent Deaniac would occasionally question some of Dean's policies, the bloggers at that site seem to be a bit "committed" to their candidate.

Even worse is the apparently related site PardonMyEnglish. As you scroll through the entries, the smiling visage of the George Bush wallpaper constantly drags your eyes away. My gawd.