Take action now: Take the Stop Amnesty Challenge.

It's up to you to block Obama's amnesty.
 

The Laura Carlsen Farce (denies North American Union from slightly-honest Left)

Laura Carlsen of the "Americas Program, Center for International Policy" (who also blogs at americasmexico.blogspot.com) offers "The North American Union Farce" (link). She raises issues with the Security and Prosperity Partnership, but she also disputes that it could be a precursor to a North American Union. This is the "slightly-honest Left" version of NAU denials, as opposed to those on the Left who are useful idiots or worse and who reflexively dismiss all concerns simply because of those who express those concerns (a recent example: Alex Pareene). She has her own issues to deal with:

While the lack of transparency and the U.S. corporate and security-dominated agenda of the SPP are cause for great concern, they are not evidence of a plot to move toward a North American Union. Among the most bizarre assumptions of NAU scaremongers is the contention that the SPP will threaten U.S. sovereignty and erase borders. The idea of a regional union that effaces U.S. sovereignty is light-years away from George W. Bush's foreign policy of unilateral action and disdain for international law and institutions. On the contrary, the precepts of the Bush administration's foreign policy point to a return to the neocon belief that the world would be a better place if the U.S. government just ran everything.

Of course, under some form of continental integration, the U.S. - or at least U.S.-based elites working with elites in the other countries - would be the ones running things, all comfortably unilateraly.

Then, it's on to the, "stop worrying about your issues, worry about mine!" part:

Given the absolute lack of factual data to support the existence of a secret plan to create a North American Union, it's tempting to assume that the NAU scare was put forth as a red herring to divert attention from real issues facing the country. By channeling the insecurities of white working-class Americans into belief in an attack on U.S. sovereignty, the NAU myth obscures the very real globalization issues raised by NAFTA - job loss, labor insecurity, the surge in illegal immigration, and racial tensions caused by the portrayal of immigrants as invaders. This is convenient for both rightwing politicians and the government and business elites they attack because real solutions to these problems would include actions anathema to the right, including unionization, enforcement of labor rights, comprehensive immigration reform, and regulation of the international market. Instead, these options are shunted aside with the redefinition of the problem as a conspiracy of anti-American elites.

1. It would be extraordinarily foolish to wait for a smoking gun before worrying about the possibility of a NAU emerging.

2. Those racial tensions aren't caused by a small number of commentors referring to an "invasion", but to the presence itself of the illegal aliens.

3. The elites trying to encourage the rest of us to think they're conspiring against us is the cover for what's in effect a conspiracy by the elites? Does that make sense to anyone else?

4. Needless to say, many of those on the right support "comprehensive immigration reform", something that would assist the elites and something that would make the situation even worse.

5. Those who support "free" trade are obviously quite willing to fluff up the pillows a bit; witness Barack Obama's proposals to slightly left-ify NAFTA, something that has no doubt been vetted as acceptable by those who support "free" trade. See, of course, his recent article in which, speaking in code, he came out in support of the SPP.

NAU · Mon, 03/03/2008 - 22:38 · Importance: 4

Tue, 03/04/2008 - 11:17
rhymefest

'While the lack of transparency and the U.S. corporate and security-dominated agenda of the SPP are cause for great concern, they are not evidence of a plot to move toward a North American Union.' So? Why does there have to be a plot for a final step NAU? She doesn't think things like SPP and NACC are part of an anti-sovereignty trend? It's like someone in 1957 saying we have this EEC, but a future EU is absurd. What's mind boggling is that there's a precedent for incremental movement toward all of these things like currency which is supposedly IMPOSSIBLE in North America. It's called Europe. But concerned citizens of all three North American countries can't even voice an opinion that they don't want to go that direction without being attacked as kooks. They get 'why worry about the impossible?' when it's already proven NOT impossible. 'Among the most bizarre assumptions of NAU scaremongers is the contention that the SPP will threaten U.S. sovereignty and erase borders.' Huh? That's the whole point--freedom of all things North American, including people, to move freely across the two borders with the U.S. Is that not an erasure of borders? The most recent ex-President has spoken of borders as on the way out and 'interdependence' on the rise. His wife's running for President. Her primary opponent and current favorite to be the next President is already talking SPP+! 'The idea of a regional union that effaces U.S. sovereignty is light-years away from George W. Bush's foreign policy of unilateral action and disdain for international law and institutions.' Again, HUH? Why are interventionist foreign policy and integrationist policies mutually exclusive? Apples and oranges!

Tue, 03/04/2008 - 15:03
Mary

Who you gonna believe ..her or your own lying eyes!!

Wed, 03/05/2008 - 07:08
Fred Dawes
www.myspace.com/freddawes1776

The north American Union is a deal made and the system wants us under it rule, so what will you do?..one word, NOTHING. So get in line like good little children waiting for a hand out.

Thu, 03/06/2008 - 06:27
Tanstaafl
age-of-treason.blogspot.com/

They are "elite" in only one respect: their treason.

Fri, 12/05/2008 - 21:07
anonymous

Man, you wingnuts are the worst. Where is the NAU? You still going to be ranting about this 10 years from now when nothing is happening? Anyone want to put their money where their mouth is and make a bet through a 3rd party like bodog?