ACLU loses church/state separation case (Jesus painting in courthouse)

Their Communist paymasters friends and allies are probably still steamed about this September 10 story:
A disputed portrait of Jesus Christ will remain at the Slidell city courthouse in Louisiana after a federal judge refused to grant a demand by the American Civil Liberties Union to have the painting removed...

In response [to the ACLU], the city of Slidell mounted additional portraits of 15 of history's preeminent lawgivers alongside the Jesus painting [which had been there for a decade]. The framed portraits added on Aug. 31 included those of Confucius, Hammurabi, Moses, Charlemagne, and Sir William Blackstone. Alongside the 16 framed portraits are a reproduction of the U.S. Constitution and a mounted explanation of the various figures in the paintings...

Comments

How ironic. So basically the ACLU has problems with the depiction of Jesus as a important secular Humanist philosopher. I don't think even Richard Dawkins would have a problem with that.

Blackstone was the man. We can thank him for much of our knowledge of English common law, to which this country's form of justice used to be based upon, before the lefties took over.

I can't believe the ACLU would attempt to remove the image of such a pre-eminent legal scholar from a courthouse! What a bunch of maroons!