Mel Martinez opposed illegal alien amnesty... in 2004

Just as Harry Reid changed his mind from supporting America's borders into supporting massive illegal immigration, Mel Martinez (R-FL) seems to have done a 180, and much more recently. From October 24, 2004:

Our immigration policy should first and foremost ensure the security of our nation and those individuals posing a terrorist threat should be prevented from entering our country. I strongly oppose amnesty for illegal aliens.

Nowadays he's the author of the massive illegal alien amnesty known as Hagel-Martinez. Of course, he'll say it isn't amnesty, but if something acts like an amnesty and is seen as an amnesty by hundreds of millions of people around the world, it's an amnesty.

Immigration · Wed, 05/17/2006 - 22:45 · · Importance: 1

Comments

people can yell all day long, the system has made its deal with the drug dealers from mexico city, you may as well just start calling the PLACE The former USA. 70 OUT OF 100 WANT MEXICO AND THE THIRD WORLD HERE. What's the point but someone will start to get out of line soon, if you know what i mean?

Posted by: Fred Dawes at May 19, 2006 7:28 PM

I have found some sites that provide the information I was asking for:
On the Amendment (Vitter Amdt. No. 3963 )
Right Side of the Rainbow

Posted by: Hal at May 18, 2006 8:42 AM

Does anyone know a site that tells which Senators voted for and against which ammendments? There have been a couple votes on amnesty in the last couple days:

from michellemalkin.com:

"The Senate defeated, 55 to 40, a proposal by Senator Johnny Isakson, Republican of Georgia, that lawmakers demand that border-security measures be in place before beginning a guest-worker program of the kind envisioned by President Bush."

from Senate OKs Border Fence, Backs Citizenship

"Vitter led the drive to strip from the bill a provision giving an eventual chance at citizenship to illegal immigrants who have been in the country more than two years. His attempt failed, 66-33, at the hands of a bipartisan coalition, and the provision survived"

Michelle Malkin gave a list of votes for the first provision, but I can't find anything for the second.

Thanks.

Posted by: Hal at May 18, 2006 8:22 AM

I think you will never get people who back "earned legalization" to agree that it is equivalent to amnesty: They always attach conditions to the "earned legalization", and if these are, or seem the least bit, punitive, e.g. paying back or presumed to be owed taxes (!), or even a fine, then this is deemed a punishment or penalty for any crimes committed (entering illegally, working illegally, etc) and so it does not count as amnesty.

If it is OK for someone to reverse their opinion in the other direction, i.e. this does not mean they are a hypocrite, then doing so in the wrong (IMO) direction has to be OK too.

Posted by: eh at May 18, 2006 4:40 AM


Independent, in-depth coverage of immigration, politics, and media bias since 2002. Also: multiculturalism, Los Angeles, California, privacy, and occasionally celebrities and wacky humor...


If you can't find what you're looking for, see the About page or use the navigation features to the right.

Start here
Previous/Next
Diversions

Main

Atom feed · RSS 2.0 feed · RSS 0.91 feed · WML

Subscribe with Bloglines
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My MSN
Please subscribe to the feed and tell your friends about this site.

Tag search
Full text search
Reliable, pre-11/19/08 only:

What's Hot

  • Can you make a phone call? Get the answers to the questions in the FAX here.
  • See the top posts in the last 45 days.
Navigation
All Tags
Note: only a fraction of the content has so far been tagged.
Site search (new window)
Custom Search

Categories
Archives

All Posts(links to each post by title)

Latest