Independent, in-depth coverage of immigration, politics, and media bias since 2002. Also: multiculturalism, Los Angeles, California, privacy, and occasionally celebrities and wacky humor...
If you can't find what you're looking for, see the About page or use the navigation features to the right.
Comments
And you STILL think Bush is a "man of the people" and the "lieberals" are the elitists!
It's not just immigration -- it's EVERYTHING. Where's that booming economy the tax cuts for the rich were going to give us? Why was it that the Clinton tax increases -- which the Republcians told us would send us into a depression -- led to the most propserous decade in history? Why is is that the times of greatest economic growth are always under DEMOCRATIC administrations -- and tax policies that are MORE progressive?
Republicans are NOT on YOUR side -- unless you're a large shareholder. They never were. Wise up, people.
Posted by: smartalek at Oct 22, 2005 1:09 AM
"If an employer has a job that no American is willing to take"
If no American worker is willing to take the job, it is because it is a low paying job with no benefits and, most likely, bad working conditions.
If employers paid such workers a decent salary, provided benefits, including medical insurance, and improved working conditions, there would be plenty American workers willing to take the jobs.
The reason that the Bush admistration has failed to enforce the immigration laws is that his corporate cronies like having cheap labor available.
Posted by: Captain Video at Oct 21, 2005 8:05 PM
Your banner page says "non-Liberal." Does this mean that even "non-liberals" are whacking Bush now? Damn, there may be hope for this country yet!
Posted by: henk at Oct 21, 2005 1:02 PM
"until he is thrown from office"
I doubt even that will help much, e.g. McCain is just as bad, if not worse, and the same for any likely Democrat. While a successor might perhaps be more tepid toward a 'guest worker' program, they'd probably insist just as loudly on the red herring of how impractical it would be to deport all the illegals here now (as if we have to do it all at once, right now), etc etc -- the whole 'let's face reality and amnesty 'em' scenario. Tougher enforcement legislation would be talked about, but even if passed this requires a commitment to implementation and oversight by the administration that to date has been totally lacking, no matter who has been in office.
Posted by: eh at Oct 21, 2005 12:47 AM
Why would anyone be surprised that Bush cares not a whit about illegal immigration? One need look no further than his appointee as head of Immigration and Naturalization - she's a 36 year old attorney with no previous experience in matters of immigration (legal experience but who knows who mows her lawn, cleans her house or nanny's her children?). To boot, she's Mrs. Michael Chertoff, head of Homeland Security. Just more of the same croneyism we have come to expect from the worst president EVER!
Bush, once again, does whatever business interests demand - that is to get out of the way as the race to the bottom of wages continues. So long as an immigrant is willing to work for less, it's find by him. You will never see true immigration reform until he is thrown from office. If employers who hire illegals were prosecuted and jailed, then and only then, will you see the flood of illegal's seeking work slow.
The mid-term elections cannot come soon enough. The, Articles of Impeachment.
Posted by: Laura Strand at Oct 20, 2005 12:41 PM