In something that apparently hasn't been covered by the U.S. press, American and Mexican legislators met in Rhode Island over the weekend to discuss issues of importance to the two countries. Similar annual meetings have been occuring for decades, and this year's event was apparently focusing on immigration matters. Details in "Strategy sought for migrant plan". I don't know how many U.S. legislators attended, but the two mentioned in the article are on the wrong side of this issue.
Of note, we have Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) saying, "It is very clear to us that there are no Mexican terrorists." First of all, that's incorrect. There are various terrorist organizations operating in Mexico, but they're concerned with internal politics so they aren't that much of a threat to the U.S.
And, of course, there are growing numbers of Muslims converts in Mexico, some of whom may take on militant points of view.
But, on the larger issue, that's also an extraordinarily naive thing for a high-level U.S. politician to say (assuming he believes it). Anyone who's an adult about this issue realizes that whenever you have millions of citizens of another country in a host country that can cause problems, including riots, agitated mobs, revolutions, civil unrest, and so forth. I mean, that's just a lesson of history. Denying that possibility is like denying all those history books in the library. He might not want to say that out loud when in discussions with our buds from the south, but I get the feeling that I'm one of the few people who's even thought about that, which isn't exactly a good thing since all those politicians are supposed to be worried about such things on my behalf.
The article also includes this charming quote from one of our friends:
Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) Dep. Alberto Aguilar, of Sinaloa, agreed it was important not to unfairly demonize Mexican migrants.
"They see monsters and ghosts where there really are none," he said.
Lonewacko,
Thanks man! Not that I don't rate terrorism highly, but it provides too much of a dodge to disguise something which to me threatens more than even terrorism - namely invasion by an army of aliens, 20 millions now resident in the U.S.- an army of invasion, occupation, and colonization. With them we can lose it all, maybe not so spectacularly as with a horrible terrorist act, but in the long run
definitely worse for the country.
How that got to be depended largely on misdirection, misnaming, and spin thru media so that enmasse the illegals crossing into the U.S. were not known/perceived to be an invasion. A lot of subversive work of media and politics went into that. It's still going on. It's a modern textbook example how to hide a forest with 20 million trees. That's a lot of trees, and that's a lot of threat. No nation in all history would not recognize it for what it is.
best regards,
burley
Posted by: Burley Morris at Jun 14, 2005 6:15 AM
Even if we assume every Mexican crossing the border is a harmless campesino, they are the responsibility of the Mexican government and society not the US. The unspoken assumption is that the people of the US have no right of self-determination and must provide jobs and social services for the Mexican poor that the millionaires and billionaires of the Mexican elite chooses not to provide for.
Posted by: mr civil rights at Jun 13, 2005 8:50 AM
Independent, in-depth coverage of immigration, politics, and media bias since 2002. Also: multiculturalism, Los Angeles, California, privacy, and occasionally celebrities and wacky humor...
If you can't find what you're looking for, see the About page or use the navigation features to the right.
Comments
Lonewacko,
Thanks man! Not that I don't rate terrorism highly, but it provides too much of a dodge to disguise something which to me threatens more than even terrorism - namely invasion by an army of aliens, 20 millions now resident in the U.S.- an army of invasion, occupation, and colonization. With them we can lose it all, maybe not so spectacularly as with a horrible terrorist act, but in the long run
definitely worse for the country.
How that got to be depended largely on misdirection, misnaming, and spin thru media so that enmasse the illegals crossing into the U.S. were not known/perceived to be an invasion. A lot of subversive work of media and politics went into that. It's still going on. It's a modern textbook example how to hide a forest with 20 million trees. That's a lot of trees, and that's a lot of threat. No nation in all history would not recognize it for what it is.
best regards,
burley
Posted by: Burley Morris at Jun 14, 2005 6:15 AM
Even if we assume every Mexican crossing the border is a harmless campesino, they are the responsibility of the Mexican government and society not the US. The unspoken assumption is that the people of the US have no right of self-determination and must provide jobs and social services for the Mexican poor that the millionaires and billionaires of the Mexican elite chooses not to provide for.
Posted by: mr civil rights at Jun 13, 2005 8:50 AM