Take action now:

Cheney on amnesty

At a town hall meeting in Iowa, VP Cheney was asked about immigration, and here's his reply:

Well, we've tightened up significantly on the borders since 9/11. We've had to. We've significantly beefed up our border security and so forth. But it continues to be a problem. Part of the difficulty that we're faced with, and one of the things that the President talked about with respect to the immigration policy is that we've got so many people coming across illegally -- primarily for economic reasons, that want to come to work in the United States. But we have no idea who is here. We have no idea what they do once they get here. We have no idea how long they're going to stay, and that there was a need to try to regularize this process. And what he has suggested is that we ought to consider the possibility of having what, in effect, would be a guest worker program so we'd know who was coming in, and that once here, then, they'd stay for a specific period of time. And they [sic] they'd have to go back home once their period of time was ended. They could not become citizens. But we would have track of who, in fact, was in the country. That's been proposed. Now, it's just an idea, a concept.

It hasn't gone anyplace legislatively at this point. And the problem we're faced with is that we need to find ways going forward to make sure we do, in fact, have knowledge of who is in the country and whether or not they've stayed, and how long they've stayed and what they're doing while they're here. And at present that's a very hard thing to do because of the enormous flow of people we've got back and forth. We've improved our system with respect to those that come in legally by visas and so forth. But we still don't have as good a grip as we need on all of those who come into the United States illegally, stay for a period of time, and then go back home.

And we need to do a better job than we are to make certain we screen out terrorists to the maximum extent possible. So it's an attempt to try to address that problem. It's not clear yet exactly how it ultimately gets sorted out or gets resolved. But that's at the heart of what is being talked about here.

Uh, why not just enforce the laws? That's one sure way to reduce the flow.

Perhaps if enough people attended meetings like this and asked tough questions - perhaps a follow-up to the answer above - some progress might be made.

Immigration2004 · Thu, 09/09/2004 - 09:46 · Importance: 1

Fri, 09/10/2004 - 06:04
jay

Yes David, you must know who every illegal works for. Prove that Republicans are often employers of illegals.

Also, Lonewacko, what would the annual costs be to actually enforce the law?

Thu, 09/09/2004 - 18:20
David Weisman
www.theartofpeace.blogspot.com

So you wouldn't mind if the price of, say, fruit went up a lot? Even if not, the businesses that employ illegal aliens are often Republican backers.