Independent, in-depth coverage of immigration, politics, and media bias since 2002. Also: multiculturalism, Los Angeles, California, privacy, and occasionally celebrities and wacky humor...
If you can't find what you're looking for, see the About page or use the navigation features to the right.
Comments
Does this mean that Mexico would actually do something that is in our interest? Or are they protecting their investment in some politicians who are beholden to them? Or could it be that what those big dealers may consider to be the worst-case scenario, might be that in which one of the candidates loses, because of terrorist incidents, which were well-known to have been preventable by being less solicitous of the contraband-shippers' preferences?
Posted by: John S Bolton at Aug 26, 2004 1:46 AM